Loch Henry: Black Mirror, Can It Happen?

Before we dive into Loch Henry, let’s flash back to when this episode first aired: June 15, 2023.

In 2023, policing and law enforcement were under intense scrutiny across the United States, and small towns in particular made headlines in ways that echo the tensions explored in Loch Henry. In January, Tyre Nichols — a 29-year-old Black man — died after being beaten by five Memphis police officers from “Scorpion”, the city’s specialized crime-suppression unit.

That same month, a violent and racially charged incident unfolded in Rankin County, Mississippi, when six white law enforcement officers entered a home without a warrant and tortured two Black men

The officers, calling themselves the “Goon Squad,” were later convicted and sentenced to prison terms ranging from 10 to 40 years. 

Meanwhile, across the U.S., countless small towns have been forced to downsize—or even disband. In Minnesota, the town of Goodhue made headlines in 2023 when its entire police force resigned over low pay and staffing challenges, leaving the community entirely in the hands of the county sheriff. 

In 2023, Netflix released Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal, a documentary that peeled back the façade of one of South Carolina’s most influential families. What started as a story about a tragic boating accident unraveled into a web of corruption, financial fraud, and generational violence orchestrated by attorney Alex Murdaugh. The series revealed how a powerful patriarch could operate unchecked for decades, because an entire community learned to look away.

All of this brings us to Black Mirror—Season 6, Episode 2: Loch Henry. The episode dives into personal trauma, systemic injustice, and buried community secrets. Davis returns to his small hometown, only to uncover a dark history of violence and corruption, including his own father’s hidden crimes. 

In this video, we’ll break down the episode’s themes, explore real-world parallels, and ask whether these events have already happened—and if not, whether it is still plausible. 

1. Still Recording

In Loch Henry, Davis brings his girlfriend Pia home to Scotland, expecting nothing more than a quiet visit and a small documentary project. But the moment they start digging into a local cold case, the more they uncover a truth no one ever intended to see. 

Digitizing his mom’s forgotten videotapes seemed like an innocent act, a way to preserve fading memories, until those memories revealed truths Davis had spent a lifetime unknowingly living beside.

What makes Loch Henry so unsettling is how familiar that unraveling feels. In real life, technology can expose the truth just as suddenly and brutally, often through the very tools we use to record memories. Old camcorders, security footage, and archived videos don’t just preserve the past; they can capture crimes, lies, and hidden actions that were never meant to be seen.

Take police body cameras. They were introduced as tools of transparency, but instead they’ve documented some of the most devastating failures in modern policing. 

On March 31, 2021, 22‑year-old Anthony Alvarez was fatally shot by a police officer in Chicago. Body‑cam footage showed Alvarez being shot in the back while fleeing, despite the police’s claim that he posed a threat.

When Pia first meets Davis’s mother, she asks if Pia grew up in America, noting her accent. What seems like an innocent question lands as a probing first impression, part of a series of subtle microaggressions that highlight her outsider status. The tension is heightened by the knowledge that Davis’s father was a police officer. These everyday slights reflect a harsher reality: around the world, visible minorities are often scrutinized and disproportionately targeted by law enforcement.

In late 2025, the Edmonton Police Service launched a pilot program equipping body-worn cameras with real-time facial recognition, scanning a “watch list” of more than 7,000 people. Privacy experts immediately raised red flags. Facial-recognition tech is still wildly unreliable, especially on marginalized groups, and rolling it out without broad public consultation risks turning entire communities into living databases.

A 2025 academic study by University of Philadelphia showed that the blurrier the footage the more facial recognition breaks down. The systems disproportionately misidentify Black people and women, creating a feedback loop of digital injustice.

Even the U.K. Home Office had to admit that the facial-recognition tools used by police generated significantly higher false positives for Black and Asian individuals—sometimes hundreds of times higher than for white subjects.

While converting old tapes to digital, Pia discovers footage that reveals Davis’s mother as an active participant in the murders.

Recording adds another layer of power to the abuse. For some perpetrators, the camera is a tool of control. Capturing the act makes it permanent, something they can own, revisit, and dominate long after the moment itself has passed.

In 2025, VICE reported on a video known online as “The Vietnamese Butcher”—a piece of footage circulated as entertainment despite documenting a real killing. Shot from multiple angles and edited like a production. 

Online investigators later linked the apparent victim to a Vietnamese man, who had previously discussed fantasies about being killed and sought out others willing to do so. At the same time, clips and still images from the video were reportedly sold in bundled packs on dark-web forums and Telegram channels.

Recording has always been sold as protection, a way to preserve facts. But from the moment video existed, it also created new problems: new forms of evidence to interpret and new arguments over who controls the narrative. History has shown how cameras can document injustice—or turn violence into spectacle, from sensationalized true crime to the disturbing legacy of snuff imagery. 

2. The Code of Silence

Once authorities uncovered Ian Adair’s torture chamber in Loch Henry, the quiet village was thrust into the national spotlight. But beneath the spectacle lies a familiar story: small communities often close ranks, protecting their own even in the face of terrible crimes.

Real-world parallels make this even more unsettling. Take Thunder Bay. For years, this Canadian city faced national scrutiny over the unexplained deaths of Indigenous youth, many of whom were dismissed as accidents or misadventures.

It wasn’t until external pressure mounted that a deeper investigation revealed systemic failures. Yet the truth only emerged fully when journalists and the Thunder Bay podcast revisited the cases, re-examining timelines and bringing long-ignored inconsistencies to light. 

Small towns often rely on overlapping social networks—police, officials, and longtime families—which makes whistleblowing socially costly. This is starkly illustrated by Skidmore, Missouri, a town of fewer than 300. In 1981, local bully Ken Rex McElroy was shot in broad daylight on the main street in front of dozens of townspeople. McElroy had terrorized residents for years and repeatedly evaded legal consequences. When he was finally killed, no one identified the shooters. The town’s near-unanimous silence was a deliberate, community-wide decision to shield those responsible.

Loch Henry captures this same dynamic: towns, families, and neighbors often band together to hide uncomfortable truths. And just like in Thunder Bay or Skidmore, it’s only when outsiders dig through old footage and forgotten records that the cracks in the community’s façade are exposed.

3. The Documentary Effect

In Loch Henry, the act of making a documentary rips open old wounds. Davis and Pia set out to film something they assume will barely get traction. But once they pitch the idea to their production contacts and unexpectedly secure funding, the project grows teeth. With real backing behind them, they push deeper into the town’s past.

In the real world, some of the biggest shifts in criminal justice have come from courageous filmmakers who were supposed to be observers — yet became participants.

In 2015, Netflix’s Making a Murderer thrust a salvage yard owner Steven Avery—convicted of the murder of photographer Teresa Halbach—into the global spotlight. The series re-examined the crime itself alongside allegations of mishandled evidence, coercive interrogations, and the institutional forces that shaped his conviction.  

The ground-breaking podcast Serial did something similar for Adnan Syed’s case in 2014, drawing millions into a meticulous re-examination of timelines, phone records, and investigative shortcuts—pressure that eventually led to the overturning of his conviction after more than two decades in prison.

Sometimes, the act of documentation itself becomes the turning point. The Jinx, released in 2015, began as a documentary profile of Robert Durst—a wealthy New York real estate heir long suspected in multiple murders but never successfully prosecuted. During post-production, filmmakers uncovered a chilling moment recorded after an interview, when Durst, still wearing a live microphone, muttered to himself: “Killed them all, of course.” That accidental recording became pivotal evidence, helping reopen the case and leading to Durst’s arrest and eventual conviction. 

Modern documentaries often succeed where police files have gone cold. Digitizing old tapes, enhancing degraded footage, re-analyzing audio, and applying new forensic tools can expose details investigators once missed. 

Series like The Staircase, The Keepers, and Don’t F**k With Cats show how returning to old evidence can fundamentally change our understanding of a crime. 

Taken together, these cases underline what Loch Henry captures so well: cameras, recordings, and storytelling don’t simply preserve the past—they dig it back up, pulling buried truths, forgotten evidence, and long-suppressed crimes into the present.

The more we unearth old recordings and forgotten technology, the more the cracks beneath the surface appear. Media can bring accountability, but it also turns private trauma into public reckoning. That tension is what makes the episode feel like a warning, because nothing truly stays buried once someone presses record.

Join my YouTube community for insights on writing, the creative process, and the endurance needed to tackle big projects. Subscribe Now!

For more writing ideas and original stories, please sign up for my mailing list. You won’t receive emails from me often, but when you do, they’ll only include my proudest works.

Not so hard times

Opinions_prison-768x516

Is minimum-security prison like summer camp effective?

By Elliot Chan, Opinions Editor
Formerly published in The Other Press. March 23, 2016

What if I told you that there are prisoners—murderers—who were having a better day than you? You would be pretty upset, right? And you aren’t even the victim or the victim’s family and friends. For many, hearing that criminals are having “easy” times as a punishment is an injustice. It’s almost as bad as hearing that they got off free.

This is the case from a recent report by Erin O’Toole, a Federal Conservation public safety critic. She went on to describe a minimum-security prison in BC as being akin to “summer camp.” These prisons are fortified with a recreation centre, tennis courts, and baseball diamonds. In addition, this prison is located in arguably one of the most beautiful regions of the province, with mountain and ocean views.

Now, I know that prisons are not meant to be inhumane torture chambers, they are meant to be more of a rehabilitation centre, where the convict can receive the necessary assistance and treatment so that they may be led back into normal society, where they can contribute in a meaningful way. Whether this is happening more effectively in a comfortable environment is something the victims of the prisoners’ crimes are extremely skeptical and upset about.

The balancing act of trying to find the punishment to fit the crime is not an easy task. It takes a lot of time, money, and effort to make sure that the end result is the “right” result. With the case of summer camp prisons, many believe that the criminals are getting off too easily. Some are even feeling that the prisoners are in fact getting some sort of luxury treatment. For murderers, that type of punishment doesn’t only make light of the heinous act… it almost appears as though the punishment encourages it.

There is a lot to like in our country, but one must admit that our justice system is still full of holes. What we have is often called a “revolving door” criminal system, where criminals go to jail for their crime, endure the hospitable environment, and return to normal society only to recommit the crime. This type of in-and-out prison—a lot like summer camp—does not solve the bigger problem. It doesn’t instill fear or teach repercussions. It’s merely a pause button for criminals. It stalls them from the next crime, like summer camp stalls us from our studies.

The punishment should always fit the crime, but I ask you this: Do the kids who get detention every week really learn from their poor decisions? Probably not, they just become acclimatized to the world they live in. They never change; they merely adapt. They accept that detention is a part of their life. Compared to many, it’s not that bad of a life. To change someone, you must really change their environment, and so it goes with murderers.

SOS Canada

 shutterstock_199724069-500x375c

Should the Canadian consulate rescue troubled citizens abroad?

By Elliot Chan, Opinions Editor

Formerly published in The Other Press. Jan. 28, 2014

Travellers know the danger of visiting a foreign country; it’s the little extra spice in travelling. They hear stories on the television about political unrest, radical rebels, and petty criminals. Still, their desire to see the world is not dampened by the risks. Travellers know if something happens to them abroad, their citizenship is enough for them to get noticed. Someone back home will care about and miss them. Their government will do whatever it takes to get them back. But what if the travellers were the troublemakers? Should they be brought back home and punished as Canadians?

We all get that anxious feeling when we cross the security checkpoint at airports. Sure, we know that we haven’t committed any crimes and that we aren’t packing any contraband, yet we still worry because the alternative of being guilty is so scary. Put yourself in the shoes of a smuggler; put yourself in the shoes of a smuggler being detained; then put yourself in the shoes of a smuggler sentenced to death. So, I ask again, should Canada save you?

Currently, the Canadian consular office provides detainees the ability to communicate with their home country, presents proper nutrition, and connects them with a legal representative, but it does not get them out of jail or post their bail or make travel accommodations for their family. Although some countries have transfer of offender arrangements—including Brazil, United Kingdom, and Thailand—many other countries don’t. The Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development has a lot of limitations when it comes to another country’s judicial system.

Travellers are not just Canadian citizens; they must also be citizens of the world. To say that they don’t know the law in another country isn’t a good excuse. That is just ignorance and deserves to be punished. The same way you wouldn’t jump into an ocean if you don’t know how to swim or what lies beneath, you shouldn’t dive into a foreign country if you don’t know what will pose harm for you, the locals, and your country’s image.

Remember that when you’re abroad you’re a representative of your homeland, regardless of where you’re from and what your background is. As much as you want to have an awesome time and make wonderful memories, it’s also important to respect other people’s home and country. Remember that you’re a guest and that you’re not entitled to anything. Be respectful and treat Cambodia, Cameroon, and Colombia the way you would treat Canada. If you follow ethical behaviour wherever you go—you know, the kind of stuff your mother taught you—you likely stay out of trouble.